Le son qui a du sens
https://phpbb.sounddesigners.org/
Ouais c'est vraiment un gros plus. J'adore!Burns a écrit :La recherche dans Sonomic est assez impressionante !
Très rapide, et surtout très utile quand on cherche un son particulier qu'on a pas. C'est Sounddogs qui va faire la gueule.....
...Nous n"aurions pas a rougir, j'ai ecouté qlq bricoles de chez eux et ca ne m'a pas impressioné, la quantité c'est sùr, pour le reste...ca m'evoque du son " a la decoupe" une amb de qlq minutes decoupée en "n" evenements sonores denués de sens, sauf de celui des affaires !de faire la même chose avec la sono SDO, non?
. Autre détail chiant qui a changé, j'utilise souvent la colonne "checked" après une recherche, pour repérer quels sons m'intéressent à priori. Puis, si je trouve finalement celui qui me plait, je le sélectionne et le "Spot".Dorian a écrit :Sinon, j'ai un petit bogue chiant ici, après le Spot, ça switch toujours vers Pro Tools même si l'option est désactivée dans les prefs
Arghh tu as raison, mais ça a l'air plus compliqué que ça... Ca va être sans fin ce problême...olafnoise a écrit :On est bien d'accord? si on tape "affichage", on trouve les "panneau d'affichage"?
Sans qu'affichage soit dans les keywords?
Voilà comme ça vous savez tout... Je vous tiendrais au courant de la suite...>Here are my thoughts and Justin perhaps can comment as well.
>
>Firstly, the apostrophe IS being treated like a character as it
>should be - if it were a separator it would always be ignored and I
>don't think that is the intention and would not provide the result
>because in many cases in French a single character exists before the
>apostrophe.
Actually if the apostrophe was treated like a separotor, it would be just perfect IMHO.
In french, you just find single "d" or "l" or "s" before it, which are absolutely useless in terms of search/find functionalies (these are not terms)... But maybe this is not the case in english? Don't know...
>You can't search for just the apostrophe in the boolean parser (main
>find box) because boolean search routines look for 'terms'. 'Fond
>d'air' is set of terms while a single apostrophe is NOT. If you
>search for "fond AND air" it must find those exact terms or a
>wildcard of them which "d'air" with the apostrophe in front of it is
>NOT thus the result. If you search for "fon *air" you should find it
>as I have told the boolean parser to look for a contains search(slower).
>
>Similarly, if you want to search for "fond air" then use the
>iterative routines like SEARCH IN FIELD and ADVANCED SEARCH which are
>VERY different routine that do not look for terms but anything that
>contains those characters - this is a much slower way of searching
>but provides an alternative to the boolean parser.
>This is the design of BOOLEAN engines. If you want "fond AND air to
>find "fond d'air" then in your thesaurus you have to tell the boolean
>engine that "air" is the same as "d'air" and now you have created a
>synonym "term".
Sure we can do that, but it's quite constricting...
>In either case, you have several features in V4pro that allow you to
>work in many different ways provided you understand the engines.
Sure, but the main search field is THE way to go in a day to day workflow. Do we (french users) have to adapt to the way Soundminer searches, or the invert? That is the question.
If results won't appear just because of a "useless" apostrophe present in the description, it's really a shame IMHO.
Just FYI, the search function in the Pro Tools's Workspace treats the apostrophe like a separator, so this specific problem is not present...
Bye.
PS: BTW, you didn't answer concerning FLAC and Ambisonic / multichannel VST, is it a "no, no"?